Faculty Advisor(s)

Sally McCormack Tutt

Document Type

Course Paper

Publication Date

10-31-2013

Rights

© 2013 Brianna Palmer

Abstract

An appraisal was made on a randomized controlled trial by Allison et al, which compared direct and indirect manual therapies for treating cervicobrachial pain syndrome. The direct therapy group (NT) received neural mobilizations, and the indirect therapy group (AT) received joint mobilizations for the glenohumeral joint and thoracic spine.

Per the Northwick Park Questionnaire and the Short Form-McGill Pain Questionnaire, decreases in pain were statistically significant for both groups from pre-assessment to post-assessment, but not between groups. When using the Visual Analog Scale, a statistically significant improvement was found for both groups over the treatment period, though only the NT group had significantly lower scores at 8 weeks.

This article offers support for both groups in treating cervicobrachial pain syndrome, however a direct approach may be advantageous. Small sample size may limit results of this study.

Files over 3MB may be slow to open. For best results, right-click and select "save as..."

Share

COinS
 
 

To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.